journal
all ![]() | Rob is 20,117 days old today. |
Sept 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Nov 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2005 jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
2007 jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec |< << more >> >| |
Entries this day: Dream Francois_movie_MOON_HARES Ultimate airplane_day Dream 9:03am JST Sunday 8 October 2006 (day 13346) Olivia got the keys to a hotel suite where her friends were staying, and where she was making a large castle out of aluminum cans in order to get a jump on the competition for this castle making contest in which Microsoft planned to participate. After she finished making the castle, she was brushing her teeth with some tooth paste that was super minty and had bright crystals like diamonds in it to visually enhance the mint flavor with sparkly visuals. She breathed on me and I was like, "wow" and asked if I could have some of the diamonds, so she kissed me and transferred some of them over. The diamonds didn't taste minty, but they were definitely crunchy. I tried not to bite them for fear of losing them / devaluing them, but they were certainly temptingly crunchable. permalinkFrancois movie MOON HARES 9:40am JST Sunday 8 October 2006 (day 13346) I just found this movie on CD from the voyage. ¤Ê¤Ä¤«¤·¡ª¡ª permalinkUltimate 2:38am JST Monday 9 October 2006 (day 13347) Super windy at ultimate today, so a lot of fun throwing discs in the craziness. Super great also that Miki came out and we got to talk about her new beau. She's a bit nervous to go visit him for an extended period, but she seemed to feel better at the end of our chat. permalinkairplane day 1:02am JST Monday 9 October 2006 (day 13347) 9/11 widows blast Bush Administration over Rice, Tenet meeting Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg, and Patty Cazaza – who are among the four widows from New Jersey known as the Jersey Girls (the fourth, Monica Gabrielle, is not a member of the group) – have issued a compilation of pre-9/11 terrorism warnings that they believe paints a disturbing picture of a negligent Presidency. They also address the latest revelation from Watergate reporter Bob Woodward that then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice was warned of a possible attack on July 10, 2001 by then-CIA Director George Tenet. The allegation in Woodward's book, State of Denial, is that Tenet was so concerned about the intelligence showing a possible attack that he phoned Rice and asked for an immediate meeting, which he got that same day, along with the CIA's top counterterrorism expert, Cofer Black. During the meeting, Tenet says, they expressed "in the starkest of terms" to Rice that an attack was imminent. Rice has denied that such a meeting took place, citing the 911 Commission Report, which never mentioned any such meeting. "It kind of doesn't ring true that you have to shock me into something I was very involved in," she stated when asked about the allegation. In addition to Rice, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft was also warned by Tenet, as was Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, according to Woodward. Ashcroft began to charter private jets shortly afterwards, avoiding all travel by commercial airliners in July and continuing to do so up until the attacks. According to a July 26, 2001 CBS news report, Ashcroft began flying by private plane after an FBI "threat assessment." "In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a 'threat assessment' by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term." It remains unclear whether or not this concern for personal safety was in any way brought on by the Tenet warnings. Initially backing Rice's denial were the 911 Commissioners themselves, who also denied having knowledge or having been briefed on such a meeting. In a remarkable turn of events, however, records of the meeting between Commission members and Tenet counter that claim – as does a State Department log book – and support Woodward's assertions about the warnings that Rice and Ashcroft had received from the CIA. As reported by the San Francisco Chronicle: Members of the commission – an independent, bipartisan panel created by Congress to investigate the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks – have said for days that they were not told about the July 10 meeting. But it turns out that the panel was, in fact, told about the meeting, according to the interview transcript and Democratic commission member Richard Ben-Veniste, who sat in on the interview with Tenet. The meeting was not identified by the July 10 date in the commission's best-selling report. Why the meeting and Tenet's interview never made it into the official 911 Commission Report remains a mystery and adds to the concern of many 911 family members and activists that a second investigation is needed. The four women, Van Auken, Kleinberg, Cazaza, and Gabrielle – who initially made news by forcing the Bush administration to acquiesce to forming the first 911 Commission and holding hearings – have issued a scathing response to this latest turn of events, citing many additional warnings that the Bush administration was given but that the 911 Commission failed, in their view, to adequately address. Their statement, in its entirety, follows: #Statement Regarding al Qaeda Threats Astonishingly, five years post 9/11 the public is made aware about an urgent July 10, 2001 meeting that took place between former CIA Director George Tenet and then, National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. This information comes from Bob Woodward's newly released book, "State of Denial"Ñœ. Despite this Administration's rhetoric that they had "no warnings"Ñœ leading up to 9/11, it has become abundantly clear, that key Administration officials were made aware of the vast array of Al Qaeda threats and warnings that existed in years prior, and more importantly, in the weeks leading up to September 11, 2001. When we add the July 10, 2001 meeting to the plethora of other clear warnings that our government had, a very concise view of the al Qaeda threat emerges. Those other warnings include, but are not limited to:
Aside from scheduling a National Security Council meeting on September 4, 2001, two months after the July 10 "connect the dots"ќ briefing from CIA director, George Tenet, the abundance of post 9/11 reports and commissions found no evidence of any action taken by appropriate officials. The 9/11 Commission itself concluded that in spite of an unprecedented attack threat in the months before 9/11, US "domestic agencies never mobilized in response to the threat. They did not have direction, and did not have a plan to institute. The borders were not hardened. Transportation systems were not fortified. Electronic surveillance was not targeted against a domestic threat. State and local law enforcement were not marshaled to augment the FBI's efforts. The public was not warned." While certain members of the 9/11 Commission recalled a January 28, 2004 closed session meeting with former CIA Director, George Tenet, where this urgent July 10, 2001 meeting was discussed, this meeting was not referenced in the Commission's final report. In the transcript testimony, the former CIA Director described the non-routine meeting that he and Cofer Black called for with then National Security Advisor, Condoleeza Rice as one of the "starkest warnings"ќ ever given by the CIA to the White House on Al Qaeda. To our continued dismay, both the Bush Administration and the 9/11 Commission have consistently failed to give a complete and honest accounting to the American public with regard to their actions and inactions leading up to the devastation of September 11, 2001. The inexcusable result of this less than truthful accounting has resulted in America making important national security decisions and passing legislation using the 9/11 Commission's conclusions and recommendations. Chillingly, these decisions appear to be based upon an unclear combination of partial truths mixed with distortions and omissions of important facts. Incredibly, five years post 9/11 we have come full circle. In spite of all the clear warnings that our government received, why did those in power fail to invoke any defensive measures to protect our nation from the attacks of September 11, 2001? We demand the immediate declassification and release of these latest documents and transcripts. The American public has the right to know what their government did or did not do to protect us from terrorist actions. Finally, instead of reorganizing an entire intelligence community because they "weren't sharing information"ќ, and rather than telling us that "9/11 was a failure of imagination"ќ, what we needed was for the 9/11 Commission to state the truth and hold those responsible to account. The most effective change for America would be to have a National Security Council that understands that it is their job to translate vital information into action. [Editor's note: Larisa Alexandrovna was involved in the writing of the film 9/11 Press for Truth.] permalinkprev day next day |